Khan123
01-19 01:55 PM
Do you have any idea about the other legal options in terms of immigration i might have.?
wallpaper goldfish from a owl in
adibhatla
04-29 12:37 PM
I traveled (together with my family) through this route last year with the same circumstances you are in. There will be no problem and they won't ask you for any documents. If your flight on return is from Dubai to any US city, they will see your AP, Passport. If you have a valid AP at that time then they will allow you back.
Cheers!
MA
Cheers!
MA
donnahff
10-14 05:48 PM
i have same too but sir what next.....?:confused:
On September 2, 2009, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I129F PETITION FOR FIANCE(E). Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
If you have questions or concerns about your application or the case status results listed above, or if you have not received a decision from USCIS within the current processing time listed*, please contact USCIS Customer Service at (800) 375-5283.
*Current processing times can be found on the USCIS website at USCIS Home Page (http://www.uscis.gov) under Case Status and Processing Dates.
*** Please do not respond to this e-mail message.
Sincerely,
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
On September 2, 2009, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I129F PETITION FOR FIANCE(E). Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
If you have questions or concerns about your application or the case status results listed above, or if you have not received a decision from USCIS within the current processing time listed*, please contact USCIS Customer Service at (800) 375-5283.
*Current processing times can be found on the USCIS website at USCIS Home Page (http://www.uscis.gov) under Case Status and Processing Dates.
*** Please do not respond to this e-mail message.
Sincerely,
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
2011 Cat spearfishing in goldfish
gc4arun
07-06 11:34 AM
bump
Sending to TSC is fine as your 140 is approved from there. My 140 was approved from TSC and my 485 was send to TSC. I was worried that it was not send to NSC but I already got my rect numbers
All the best
A
Sending to TSC is fine as your 140 is approved from there. My 140 was approved from TSC and my 485 was send to TSC. I was worried that it was not send to NSC but I already got my rect numbers
All the best
A
more...
Blog Feeds
09-28 12:50 PM
Foreign nationals who have stayed in the United States after the expiration of their period of authorized stay or are present in the United States without being admitted or paroled are unlawfully present in the U.S.
If more than 180 days but less than a year of unlawful presence accrues, then the foreign national is inadmissible for three years (three year bar). Foreign nationals who are unlawfully present for one year or more are inadmissible for 10 years (10 year bar). If a foreign national has accrued unlawful presence in the United States, then they are deemed inadmissible and illegible to re-enter the U.S. for either the three year or 10 year bar from the date they leave the U.S.
There is a waiver available for the unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility. Essentially the waiver will waive the three and 10 year bar of inadmissibility. The waiver is only available to foreign nationals with a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouse or parent. Children are not deemed qualifying relatives for the waiver. The first step in the waiver process is for the foreign national to attend an immigrant visa consular interview in their home country. Once the consular officer deems the foreign national is inadmissible and a waiver is available, the foreign national will then file the waiver (form I-601, with the applicable filing fee) and establish there is extreme hardship to the U.S. citizen or LPR spouse or parent if the foreign national were not allowed to return to the United States. The waiver request is discretionary and extreme hardship is only one factor the officer will consider.
Certain individuals do not accrue unlawful presence and are not subject to the three or 10 year bar. For instance, foreign nationals under 18 years of age do not accrue unlawful presence.
For more information on the waiver process, and extreme hardship, please call Kraft & Associates at 214-999-9999.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/4VwzqcGxyMc/)
If more than 180 days but less than a year of unlawful presence accrues, then the foreign national is inadmissible for three years (three year bar). Foreign nationals who are unlawfully present for one year or more are inadmissible for 10 years (10 year bar). If a foreign national has accrued unlawful presence in the United States, then they are deemed inadmissible and illegible to re-enter the U.S. for either the three year or 10 year bar from the date they leave the U.S.
There is a waiver available for the unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility. Essentially the waiver will waive the three and 10 year bar of inadmissibility. The waiver is only available to foreign nationals with a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouse or parent. Children are not deemed qualifying relatives for the waiver. The first step in the waiver process is for the foreign national to attend an immigrant visa consular interview in their home country. Once the consular officer deems the foreign national is inadmissible and a waiver is available, the foreign national will then file the waiver (form I-601, with the applicable filing fee) and establish there is extreme hardship to the U.S. citizen or LPR spouse or parent if the foreign national were not allowed to return to the United States. The waiver request is discretionary and extreme hardship is only one factor the officer will consider.
Certain individuals do not accrue unlawful presence and are not subject to the three or 10 year bar. For instance, foreign nationals under 18 years of age do not accrue unlawful presence.
For more information on the waiver process, and extreme hardship, please call Kraft & Associates at 214-999-9999.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/4VwzqcGxyMc/)
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
The Senators are coming, the Senators are coming! That's right, the Senate is debating the DHS Appropriations bill right now, and immigration amendments are being offered. I blogged about the Sessions E-Verify proposal yesterday. Well bill, that passed by voice vote this morning, but not before the Senate voted down a proposal from Senator Schumer to table the Sessions proposal. Senator Leahy, in an astute move prior to the vote on Sessions' E-Verify bill, amended that bill to include a permanent extension of the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program. So, Leahy's amendment permanently extending the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program was approved too!
Senator DeMint from South Carolina threw in a bill to mandate the construction of actual fences along 700 miles of the Southern Border, taking away the right of DHS/CBP to decide how best to protect that border. That has also passed.
Senator Hatch has now introduced a bill which includes positive changes including undoing the Widow Penalty, and a religious worker extension and a rural doctors program extension. You can still call the Senate Switchboard to voice your support for this latter bill, and your disgust with the Senate passage of laws without debate that will affect millions of lives and cost billions of dollars. You can reach your Senator by calling 202-224-3121.
All of these amendments, of course, must now go back to a conference committee with the House, and there is no guarantee that any of them will become law. But, lest you thought your time to relax from calling your Congressman was over, it has now started again. Get on the phone and start demanding REAL Immigration Reform, rather than this piecemeal junk.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7232301415393625463?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/senate-is-at-it-again-hold-onto-your.html)
The Senators are coming, the Senators are coming! That's right, the Senate is debating the DHS Appropriations bill right now, and immigration amendments are being offered. I blogged about the Sessions E-Verify proposal yesterday. Well bill, that passed by voice vote this morning, but not before the Senate voted down a proposal from Senator Schumer to table the Sessions proposal. Senator Leahy, in an astute move prior to the vote on Sessions' E-Verify bill, amended that bill to include a permanent extension of the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program. So, Leahy's amendment permanently extending the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program was approved too!
Senator DeMint from South Carolina threw in a bill to mandate the construction of actual fences along 700 miles of the Southern Border, taking away the right of DHS/CBP to decide how best to protect that border. That has also passed.
Senator Hatch has now introduced a bill which includes positive changes including undoing the Widow Penalty, and a religious worker extension and a rural doctors program extension. You can still call the Senate Switchboard to voice your support for this latter bill, and your disgust with the Senate passage of laws without debate that will affect millions of lives and cost billions of dollars. You can reach your Senator by calling 202-224-3121.
All of these amendments, of course, must now go back to a conference committee with the House, and there is no guarantee that any of them will become law. But, lest you thought your time to relax from calling your Congressman was over, it has now started again. Get on the phone and start demanding REAL Immigration Reform, rather than this piecemeal junk.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7232301415393625463?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/senate-is-at-it-again-hold-onto-your.html)
more...
feedfront
08-14 03:19 PM
For my canada trip (by car), CBP-Us just checked my H1-B approval (passport had old exprired visa) and they let me in.
I think it's true only for entry by road.
I think it's true only for entry by road.
2010 from goldfish bowl and cat
garybanz
08-27 02:48 PM
^^^^^^
more...
aguy
07-27 02:37 PM
Hi,
My I-140 is pending, and my H1B renewal is also pending. Can I travel to India? If yes, what will I show as proof at re-entry?
How will it be for my wife? She is on F1 going on to OPT and a pending I-485 linked to my I-140 application.
Thanks.
My I-140 is pending, and my H1B renewal is also pending. Can I travel to India? If yes, what will I show as proof at re-entry?
How will it be for my wife? She is on F1 going on to OPT and a pending I-485 linked to my I-140 application.
Thanks.
hair Related topics: cat, cats,
uimv
05-27 01:21 PM
Hello,
If PD is current, are there disadvantages of being outside US (on AP) ?
Thank You.
If PD is current, are there disadvantages of being outside US (on AP) ?
Thank You.
more...
skakodker
02-14 05:04 PM
Hello All,
I have my EAD as does my wife. We are still on valid H1s (until 2009) and I have no plans to change my employer. We also received our travel documents. The question I have, and need your input on is can my wife travel (to India) and back on her H4 (even though we've filed for adjustment of status) or does she have to use her Advance Parole to do so?
I apologise if this question's been asked before and thank you in advance for your answers. Please email the same to me at skakodker@hotmail.com if you feel that is more convenient.
Best regards,
Sunil
I have my EAD as does my wife. We are still on valid H1s (until 2009) and I have no plans to change my employer. We also received our travel documents. The question I have, and need your input on is can my wife travel (to India) and back on her H4 (even though we've filed for adjustment of status) or does she have to use her Advance Parole to do so?
I apologise if this question's been asked before and thank you in advance for your answers. Please email the same to me at skakodker@hotmail.com if you feel that is more convenient.
Best regards,
Sunil
hot CAT FISHING FOR GOLD FISH IN
amoljak
03-28 03:49 PM
Bush said he wants to improve the working visas, I think the prority needs to offer to Canadians because Canadinas use the same language and education system, the distance is closer. We need to call all the senetors, the working visas.etc. need to go to Canadina citizens first.
I agree. For the genero city of canedians for using the same langwage, the goverment also pay for at least one ice hoky rink in every city. But what about the French canadians.. they should instead be called freedom canadians and directly get a green card...
I agree. For the genero city of canedians for using the same langwage, the goverment also pay for at least one ice hoky rink in every city. But what about the French canadians.. they should instead be called freedom canadians and directly get a green card...
more...
house Tags: cat fish goldfish bowl
memyselfandus
04-21 09:09 PM
Was it paper based filing?
tattoo stuck in the goldfish bowl
handless
04-18 06:00 PM
heres another one for ya, there real basic but hey simplisity is good.
more...
pictures Cat Gazing Through A Bowl At A
GotGC??
06-15 09:51 PM
You should be glad it says 2006, check out Texas I-140, it's now back to August 01, 2003 for EB3!!
I kept checking for the processing times for I-140 for my wife on the following link https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp under the Nebraska center. Till yesterday the post date was showing May 18th and the processing time for I-140 was shown as 'September 2006' today the posted date changed to 15th June but the I-140 processing date went back to 'January 2006'. Can someone explain how is this possible? Shouldnt the processing date mean that applications received till 25th Sept 2006 have been processed? If thats correct then how can the date go back to Jan 1 2006? I dont think this can be a typo, it must have some reasoning. I would appreciate if someone can explain this in the forum
Thanks
--sembat
I kept checking for the processing times for I-140 for my wife on the following link https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp under the Nebraska center. Till yesterday the post date was showing May 18th and the processing time for I-140 was shown as 'September 2006' today the posted date changed to 15th June but the I-140 processing date went back to 'January 2006'. Can someone explain how is this possible? Shouldnt the processing date mean that applications received till 25th Sept 2006 have been processed? If thats correct then how can the date go back to Jan 1 2006? I dont think this can be a typo, it must have some reasoning. I would appreciate if someone can explain this in the forum
Thanks
--sembat
dresses Kitty Cat with Goldfish
krishna_brc
12-18 04:53 PM
Unless the dependent is going to have his 140 filed under EB1 I am not sure it would help.
But to answer your question, I think it is ok to file. Check with your attorney before you do that though
Thanks.
But to answer your question, I think it is ok to file. Check with your attorney before you do that though
Thanks.
more...
makeup Home cat and a gold fish.,
texandude
06-21 12:06 PM
Hi,
I have been offered a job with a company who has an approved labor of Priority date Dec 2002. Seems like a good deal but I wanted to know if Labor Transfer is still possible. I mean Labor can be transfered from someone's name to mine.
Please respond ASAP.If I can get a response it'll be great.
I have been offered a job with a company who has an approved labor of Priority date Dec 2002. Seems like a good deal but I wanted to know if Labor Transfer is still possible. I mean Labor can be transfered from someone's name to mine.
Please respond ASAP.If I can get a response it'll be great.
girlfriend hugging a goldfish bowl
yganreddy
08-31 12:50 PM
USCIS updates the status with this generic message when they receive response to the RFE. Regarding the interview, I think its random and there is no specific criteria for USCIS.
hairstyles Glass Gold Fish Bowl Stand
sonu9
07-30 12:56 PM
Hello Attorneys/ known guys, ( first of all sorry for reposting new thread , i ddidnt get anyanswers but ead and ap expire time is coming soon )
How are you doing ? i am new to here. i will fill all details soon. sorry for that.
Before i stayed in place "X " which comes under nebrasaka centre, applied for 485, ead and ap. my company also in " X " only.
Right now i am in place " Y " which comes under Texas centre ( because of my job i moved recently) . Now i want to renew my ead and ap my self . my job, payroll and living is in place " Y " only.
But my pemanent address is " X " only. I want to continue that for my full GC process.
what my question is what i have to mention the address for my ead and ap renewal ?
1) is it "X " address as it is my permanent address and applied my 485 also from there and wish to continue or my "Y " address as i am working , living and payroll are here ?
2) If i mention " X " address is there any problem ? , dont think wrongly as i really dont know
3) if i put " Y " address is my case ead and ap along with 485 will move to Texas centre ?
i really want to avoid it if chances are there in good way as my case before everything in Nebrasca centre compared to Texas centre procesing time is good
4) If i put " Y " address i will get any RFE ?
I really dont want that as my 485 was applied from " X " place.
please answer . Thankyou in advance.
How are you doing ? i am new to here. i will fill all details soon. sorry for that.
Before i stayed in place "X " which comes under nebrasaka centre, applied for 485, ead and ap. my company also in " X " only.
Right now i am in place " Y " which comes under Texas centre ( because of my job i moved recently) . Now i want to renew my ead and ap my self . my job, payroll and living is in place " Y " only.
But my pemanent address is " X " only. I want to continue that for my full GC process.
what my question is what i have to mention the address for my ead and ap renewal ?
1) is it "X " address as it is my permanent address and applied my 485 also from there and wish to continue or my "Y " address as i am working , living and payroll are here ?
2) If i mention " X " address is there any problem ? , dont think wrongly as i really dont know
3) if i put " Y " address is my case ead and ap along with 485 will move to Texas centre ?
i really want to avoid it if chances are there in good way as my case before everything in Nebrasca centre compared to Texas centre procesing time is good
4) If i put " Y " address i will get any RFE ?
I really dont want that as my 485 was applied from " X " place.
please answer . Thankyou in advance.
CADude
08-22 11:57 PM
Please consult qualified attorney.
I've recently filed my 485.
In my labor and I140 I have my job title as ' Data ware house architect'.
My H1 says 'Programmer Analyst'. So while applying my 485 I menationed my current occupation as 'Programmer Analyst', which is different from what my labor and 140 says.Will this create any problem?
Please advise.
I've recently filed my 485.
In my labor and I140 I have my job title as ' Data ware house architect'.
My H1 says 'Programmer Analyst'. So while applying my 485 I menationed my current occupation as 'Programmer Analyst', which is different from what my labor and 140 says.Will this create any problem?
Please advise.
ramesh9
08-20 10:09 AM
Thanks Aluwal. I was just concerned that I got mine and she didnt. but thanks for your quick help. So I guess that's common where the spouses EAD comes later...
No comments:
Post a Comment