aj_jadeja
11-14 12:15 AM
Guys
Please chk this URL its about lame duck session . I know its dated Nov 9th but still.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r109:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20061109)
it says this.
November 15 and 16, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, oversight hearings entitled ``The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act: Are We Fulfilling the Promise We Made to Cold War Veterans When We Created the Program?'' (Parts IV and V), 2 p.m., on November 15 and 10 a.m., on November 16, 2141 Rayburn.
I m confused with above details.
Aj
Please chk this URL its about lame duck session . I know its dated Nov 9th but still.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r109:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20061109)
it says this.
November 15 and 16, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, oversight hearings entitled ``The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act: Are We Fulfilling the Promise We Made to Cold War Veterans When We Created the Program?'' (Parts IV and V), 2 p.m., on November 15 and 10 a.m., on November 16, 2141 Rayburn.
I m confused with above details.
Aj
wallpaper Emma Watson on the cover of US
setpit_gc
04-29 01:27 PM
Thanks a lot for your quick reply.
How do I delete the other threrad?.
Thanks
Ram
How do I delete the other threrad?.
Thanks
Ram
MatsP
August 28th, 2009, 01:00 PM
I can't really help much, but I would say that going Canon won't actually help (unless you would be happy to use the Canon Digital Photo Professional tools, which is a simpler variant of lightroom, sort of).
New formats of RAW format always needs newer versions of software.
--
Mats
New formats of RAW format always needs newer versions of software.
--
Mats
2011 Look Emma Watson in new Vogue
meridiani.planum
12-07 05:37 PM
I am not sure what is the process after fingerprinting. Can someone please clarify?
I believe NameCheck must have been initiated. As far as processing 485 is concerned, does the PD have to be current?
I am trying to figure out what is the tentative schedule for the "magical" GC to appear in my mailbox :) ?
I would appreciate any pointers / links
A million eyes, a million boots in line,
Without expression, waiting for a sigh. - W.H. (Wystan Hugh) Auden
PD needs to be current for approval. Assuming you are from CHina/India, it could be a long wait dude...
I believe NameCheck must have been initiated. As far as processing 485 is concerned, does the PD have to be current?
I am trying to figure out what is the tentative schedule for the "magical" GC to appear in my mailbox :) ?
I would appreciate any pointers / links
A million eyes, a million boots in line,
Without expression, waiting for a sigh. - W.H. (Wystan Hugh) Auden
PD needs to be current for approval. Assuming you are from CHina/India, it could be a long wait dude...
more...
rorypirrie
03-25 04:00 PM
Thanks. Will look out for it.
prince_waiting
08-20 05:29 PM
Comprehensive immigration under Democrats did not have anything for us as high skilled immigrants anyways. With a decrease in EB visa numbers in fact it was anti high skilled immigrants.
In fact the IV community was rejoicing when it fell through in the senate.
Now that CIR has been pushed ahead, IV can easily put forth the perspective of having a legislation specifically for the skilled community.
Lets look at it this way, CIR was an excuse used by a lot of politicians to avoid solving issues faced by the highly skilled community; with its demise they have one less excuse.
In fact the IV community was rejoicing when it fell through in the senate.
Now that CIR has been pushed ahead, IV can easily put forth the perspective of having a legislation specifically for the skilled community.
Lets look at it this way, CIR was an excuse used by a lot of politicians to avoid solving issues faced by the highly skilled community; with its demise they have one less excuse.
more...
kotivella
07-28 11:18 AM
485 : Pending
140- Approved in year 2006
Current status: Working on EAD
I left my GC Sponsered company in Oct 2008 and started working on EAD.. >> Filled AC21 in N0v 2008 thru a consulting company >>
Got RFE on employment verification on May 2009.. replied and have no comments from USCIS yet.. (assuming everything is okay as their repsonse time 60 days elapsed)
Now got rolled out from project and no paycheck form since june 2009
and Now found a project but the vendor wont do corp-to-corp..but only W2...
THIS CASE CAN I JOIN WITH this Vendor ON W2 With out applying for one more AC21??
Appreciate your ideas.. thanks lot
140- Approved in year 2006
Current status: Working on EAD
I left my GC Sponsered company in Oct 2008 and started working on EAD.. >> Filled AC21 in N0v 2008 thru a consulting company >>
Got RFE on employment verification on May 2009.. replied and have no comments from USCIS yet.. (assuming everything is okay as their repsonse time 60 days elapsed)
Now got rolled out from project and no paycheck form since june 2009
and Now found a project but the vendor wont do corp-to-corp..but only W2...
THIS CASE CAN I JOIN WITH this Vendor ON W2 With out applying for one more AC21??
Appreciate your ideas.. thanks lot
2010 Cover Vogue US July 2011!
md2003
04-11 02:25 PM
As long as previous employer not revoked/Cancel your i-140 you are safe. You can port your priority date.
But i don't see any body who ported PD even if prior employer cancel or revoke.
But i don't see any body who ported PD even if prior employer cancel or revoke.
more...
swarnapuri
02-14 12:12 PM
Hope this is just a LULL before the storm... Hopefully we will see a big storm and they open the flood gates!!!
Also, Other than just hopping... please contribute to IV.
Also, Other than just hopping... please contribute to IV.
hair Magazine: US Vogue Issue: July
gcseeker2002
01-02 12:56 PM
I have been in this country close to 11 years, and have PD of Feb 2004 EB3 India, and am thinking if I could apply for EB1 through another company than my employer. I am currently using EAD to work but I recently met someone who got GC through EB1 having started the process in 2008. I am really frustrated with the EB3 progress and have no hope so was thinking of this option. I have Masters with about 13 years of experience. Just wanted to check out if any of you are having similar thoughts and if this is a possible route ?
Also , is Labor substitution still a path or has that been blocked out ?
Any useful responses appreciated. TIA.
Also , is Labor substitution still a path or has that been blocked out ?
Any useful responses appreciated. TIA.
more...
needhelp!
01-14 01:02 PM
If you are already in US, you don't need DS-230, you need to file I-485 instead.
I-130 is an alien relative petition filed by your spouse on your behalf. I-130 has a question if you want to "adjust status while in the U.S." or go through "consular processing at an American post abroad".
If you plan to "adjust your status while in the U.S." you use form I-485. I-130/I-485 can be filed and adjudicated concurrently.
If you want to enter the U.S. as an immigrant ("consular processing" you file form DS-230 Part I with the National Visa Center and later DS-230 Part II with a consular officer at a consulate/embassy outside of the U.S.
I-130 is an alien relative petition filed by your spouse on your behalf. I-130 has a question if you want to "adjust status while in the U.S." or go through "consular processing at an American post abroad".
If you plan to "adjust your status while in the U.S." you use form I-485. I-130/I-485 can be filed and adjudicated concurrently.
If you want to enter the U.S. as an immigrant ("consular processing" you file form DS-230 Part I with the National Visa Center and later DS-230 Part II with a consular officer at a consulate/embassy outside of the U.S.
hot Model: Emma Watson
meenu_a
03-30 11:45 PM
Hi Becks,
Thank you so much. I am much relieved now. So, As long as I work for the sponsoring employer(even though the labor location is different) is it ok to file Ac-21 and move to another employer.? My impression was that I was obliged to work for that exact position(the one on the labor) to prove the 'intent'.
Thanks.
Thank you so much. I am much relieved now. So, As long as I work for the sponsoring employer(even though the labor location is different) is it ok to file Ac-21 and move to another employer.? My impression was that I was obliged to work for that exact position(the one on the labor) to prove the 'intent'.
Thanks.
more...
house Emma Watson stars in the July
GC_ki_daud
07-11 04:04 PM
:eek:
tattoo Emma Watson Vogue US July 2011
swarnapuri
02-14 12:12 PM
Hope this is just a LULL before the storm... Hopefully we will see a big storm and they open the flood gates!!!
Also, Other than just hopping... please contribute to IV.
Also, Other than just hopping... please contribute to IV.
more...
pictures PHOTO: Emma Watson#39;s US Vogue
looivy
12-22 12:45 PM
could this be true?
Repubs are the only one from whom we can expect support for legals.
Dems didn't do sh%$ in first two years when they had majority in all chambers and now they are trying to make repubs look bad.
Repubs are the only one from whom we can expect support for legals.
Dems didn't do sh%$ in first two years when they had majority in all chambers and now they are trying to make repubs look bad.
dresses Wonderful Emma Watson New
buehler
07-21 11:54 AM
Hi, Please let me know your thought on my situation. I was on H1 thru Company A. I don't have pay stubs for the last 3 months of 2005 since i was on bench, but got the salary that is mentioned on LCA in pay stubs till end of Sept. When I asked my employer to pay me for the time on bench he said that he has paid the LCA salary and doesn't have to pay.
So having said that, am I in Status or Out of Status?
If the W-2 is for more than the LCA requirement, you don't have any thing to worry about.
So having said that, am I in Status or Out of Status?
If the W-2 is for more than the LCA requirement, you don't have any thing to worry about.
more...
makeup emma watson vogue cover us
immi_seeker
08-31 06:08 PM
I took an infopass appointment last october and my FBI name check status was pending. After seeing the USCIS memo on march4th that all namecheck pending for 180 days has been cleared by feb 28th 2009, i went again for an infopass appt last week. IO toldme that my namecheck is still pending.
So i contacted my senators office same day and sent all my info along with the USCIS memo. Next day senators office called me back and told me that they called USCIS and came to know that my name check has been cleared. Senators office told me that infopass information could be wrong or may not have been updated.
IS that a possibility ? any inputs ?
I took infopass again last week and the IO told me the FBI name check is still pending. My lawyer initiated and inquiry to nebraska serv center and got following notification
"CIS electronic records indicate that both applicants have current Fingerprint results and FBI name checks"
Does that mean FBI name check is cleared?. If yes why infopass showing wrong thing?. Also i had only one FP done, that was in sep 2007.
So i contacted my senators office same day and sent all my info along with the USCIS memo. Next day senators office called me back and told me that they called USCIS and came to know that my name check has been cleared. Senators office told me that infopass information could be wrong or may not have been updated.
IS that a possibility ? any inputs ?
I took infopass again last week and the IO told me the FBI name check is still pending. My lawyer initiated and inquiry to nebraska serv center and got following notification
"CIS electronic records indicate that both applicants have current Fingerprint results and FBI name checks"
Does that mean FBI name check is cleared?. If yes why infopass showing wrong thing?. Also i had only one FP done, that was in sep 2007.
girlfriend VOGUE US July 2011 - Emma
maine_gc
12-16 08:24 AM
KY residents please post here and join your state chapter
hairstyles Emma Watson by Mario Testino,
Queen Josephine
August 10th, 2005, 09:19 AM
Jason, agree with Kevin. I did take a quick look at your site however and I see you like to do landscapes. You have a good eye for composition. Some of the pics could benefit from some post processing in a graphics program like photoshop or paintshop pro. A few of the landscapes are heavy on the magenta or cyan scale, a few have washed out skies (there are techniques to deal with that). Best to post a pic in a thread for specific feedback or answers to questions you may have.
immigrationvoice1
01-22 07:32 AM
...it makes sense totally...
andycool
12-23 10:12 AM
I have two I -140's approved with one PD from end of 2005 and other end of 2006 both on EB2. I 485 is based based on 2nd one in 2006. So question is can I port 2005 pd to I 485 based on 2006?
Some where I heard that you can only port the PD when your 2nd is application stage and is pending. but here it is applied and already approved. Is it a good case for Porting PD or interfiling?
And by the way what is the difference between porting and interfiling?
Thanks
Porting and interfiling are pretty much same ...( some use interfiling to use cross changeability ) .
you should be able to use your old PD ...Just ask your attorney to contact USCIS with your old I 140. and New I 140. Lot if times USCIS automatically links your PD's . But again its USCIS?? Just follow up with your attorney , you can take a infopass and show them your documents ( some officers are Info pass know the issue and will help you )
Thanks
Some where I heard that you can only port the PD when your 2nd is application stage and is pending. but here it is applied and already approved. Is it a good case for Porting PD or interfiling?
And by the way what is the difference between porting and interfiling?
Thanks
Porting and interfiling are pretty much same ...( some use interfiling to use cross changeability ) .
you should be able to use your old PD ...Just ask your attorney to contact USCIS with your old I 140. and New I 140. Lot if times USCIS automatically links your PD's . But again its USCIS?? Just follow up with your attorney , you can take a infopass and show them your documents ( some officers are Info pass know the issue and will help you )
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment